Why Are Critics Divided Over Kantara Chapter 1? Find Out Here!

By Mayur Shinde
Updated October 2, 2025 | 2 min read

The release of Kantara Chapter 1 has sparked one of the most interesting debates of recent times in Indian cinema. Critics and audiences are surprisingly split—why does a film with such technical brilliance and cultural depth evoke such contrasting opinions? This piece peels back the layers of reviews to reveal the key reasons behind the division.

Technical Brilliance, But Narrative Clutter?

Many reviewers praise the film’s visual and technical achievements. The seamless blending of war scenes, folklore elements, and stunning VFX stands out as a major draw. The soundtrack, too, elevates the emotional intensity, especially in the climax, which many consider breathtaking.

Kantara Chapter 1 Social Media Buzz

However, criticism stems largely from the screenplay’s pacing and execution. The plot is ambitious but sometimes cluttered, attempting to juggle complex themes that lead to underdeveloped characters and hurried storytelling. This leaves some viewers feeling disoriented and craving more cohesion.

The Challenge of Prequel Expectations

Prequels always face higher scrutiny, especially when they follow a beloved original. Some critics feel Kantara Chapter 1 suffers from “sequel-itis”—trying hard to connect dots left open in its predecessor but losing narrative clarity in the process. There is also debate over how well it balances cultural authenticity with cinematic spectacle.

Cultural Representation: Heroism vs Occultism

A unique tension arises in how the film portrays the native culture: the clash between divine sanctity and sinister occultism divides opinions. While some applaud the thematic depth exploring forced cultural exchange and ideological oppression, others feel the film falls into familiar spiritual tropes without offering new insights.

Kantara Chapter 1 vs Indian Epics: Can It Match Rajamouli’s Spectacle?

Part of the critical conversation also compares Kantara Chapter 1 to other Indian epic films, especially those by SS Rajamouli. The comparison raises the stakes—can Kantara truly compete in an industry dominated by grand Telugu spectacles? Read our full Kantara Chapter 1 movie review for an in-depth analysis.

FAQs
Why are critics divided over Kantara Chapter 1’s storytelling despite praising its visuals?
Many critics feel that while the film masters technical brilliance, the ambitious screenplay tries to handle too many themes, leading to clutter and underdeveloped characters.
How does Kantara Chapter 1 handle the clash between cultural authenticity and cinematic spectacle?
The prequel attempts to honor rooted folklore but also leans toward grand visuals, creating a debate on whether it compromises cultural depth for scale.
What makes Kantara Chapter 1 different from epics like SS Rajamouli’s films?
Unlike Rajamouli’s large-than-life cinematic heroism, Rishab Shetty focuses on darker spiritual themes and cultural conflicts, which some hail as bold while others find niche.
Why do some critics see “sequel-itis” in Kantara Chapter 1?
The film, being a prequel, tries to tie every loose end from the first part. This effort to connect dots sometimes overshadows clarity and pacing, causing mixed reactions.
How has Kantara Chapter 1’s portrayal of heroism versus occultism sparked debate?
Some viewers admire its nuanced portrayal of divine faith against menacing occultism, while others believe it repeats familiar spiritual tropes without offering new meaning.
Rate this
By Mayur Shinde